JEE Africa

JEE Insights
Domitilla’s Case: Implications of the Decision of the Trade Mark Registrar for Brand Owners in Nigeria

Domitilla’s Case: Implications of the Decision of the Trade Mark Registrar for Brand Owners in Nigeria

Domitilla’ is the title of the 1996 controversial movie produced by Zeb Ejiro, which starred Anne Njemanze as the lead character. Years after the release of the movie, Njemanze trade marked the name “Domitilla” on September 16, 2020. This was reportedly the same year that Zeb Ejiro Productions in collaboration with FilmOne Entertainment and Omoni Oboli’s Dioni Vision announced plans to make a sequel to the original movie, titled “Domitilla: The Reboot.’

BACKGROUND/MATERIAL FACT

Domitilla’ is the title of the 1996 controversial movie produced by Zeb Ejiro, which starred Anne Njemanze as the lead character. Years after the release of the movie, Njemanze trade marked the name “Domitilla” on September 16, 2020. This was reportedly the same year that Zeb Ejiro Productions in collaboration with FilmOne Entertainment and Omoni Oboli’s Dioni Vision announced plans to make a sequel to the original movie, titled “Domitilla: The Reboot.’

EXHUMATION OF THE PROBLEM

Brand owners in Nigeria are questioning the powers of the Trade Marks Registrar following a controversial decision that has raised concerns about the status of their marks beyond the statutory opposition period.

Section 20 of the Trade Marks Act provides that ‘Any person may within two months from the date of the publication…of notice of an application, give notice to the Registrar of opposition to the registration.’ It is important to note that the Act does not create any abandonment provision for failure to file an opposition within two months. Rather, the Act stipulates that where an applicant fails to send in a counter-statement to an opposition within one month from the receipt of the opposition duplicate, such application will be deemed abandoned.

Therefore, opposition proceedings purport to give more leverage to the opposition than to an application, so as to ensure the integrity and accuracy of trade marks in the register. Indeed, one can appreciate this point further after evaluating the powers of the Registrar to rectify and correct the register.

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Jackson, Etti, & Edu (JEE) or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: October 1, 2024.

Subscribe to JEE Insights

Topics of Interest