Authors
Expertise
Healthcare disputes in Nigeria sit at the intersection of law, medicine and public policy. They span a wide spectrum, including clinical negligence claims, professional discipline proceedings, regulatory enforcement and mass-tort style claims arising from systemic failures within healthcare delivery.
Introduction
Introduction Healthcare disputes in Nigeria sit at the intersection of law, medicine and public policy. They span a wide spectrum, including clinical negligence claims, professional discipline proceedings, regulatory enforcement and mass-tort style claims arising from systemic failures within healthcare delivery.
This article examines the legal landscape that governs liability, insurance and compensation in healthcare disputes; diagnoses the practical and structural problems that frustrate fair and timely outcomes; and proposes pragmatic, forward-looking measures aimed at reducing harm, improving dispute resolution and safeguarding the interests of patients, healthcare practitioners and payors.
The Legal Landscape — Who, What and How
At its core, a healthcare dispute is a legal claim arising from an alleged breach of a legal duty owed by a healthcare provider (individual or institution) to a patient. Those claims typically proceed along three tracks:
Professional/Regulatory Discipline — This refers to complaints lodged with licensing and professional bodies that may lead to sanctions, suspension or deregistration. Professional codes of conduct and regulatory statutes enforced through the disciplinary machinery of the medical and allied councils are the primary route for addressing conduct that raises issues of professional misconduct.
Civil Liability/Compensation — Claims brought before civil courts seeking damages for negligence in tort, breach of contract (where there is an express or implied contractual relationship), or, less commonly, statutory causes of action. Such claims typically seek monetary compensation for physical injury, emotional harm, economic loss, or wrongful death.
Criminal Liability — This is applicable only in exceptional circumstances where conduct rises to the level of reckless or intentionally harmful acts. In such cases, criminal prosecution may follow. Examples include unlawful killing or grievous bodily harm.
The statutory and regulatory architecture governing these disputes includes the National Health Act and various professional regulatory frameworks. Licensing authorities set standards of practice, enforce disciplinary measures and issue professional guidelines which courts frequently rely upon when determining the standard of care.
Read More...
Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Jackson, Etti, & Edu (JEE) or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: October 1, 2024.
